Monday 23 September 2013

Blue Stockings - Shakespeare's Globe

The first thing we noticed when we went to see Blue Stockings at the Globe (21/9/13 at 2pm) was that the audience, overall, was shorter than usual. Perhaps there were proportionally more women in the audience, with this being a play about women’s education. It’s funny, though, isn’t it: would a play about men’s education attract a predominantly male audience?

But for an audience of modern, educated women (and modern, educated men), Jessica Swale’s new play Blue Stockings hit all the right notes. You could feel the audience bristling with indignation at some of the male characters’ attitudes towards women. And that indignation manifested itself in audible gasps – and even erupted into boos at certain points of the play.

I do love a Globe audience – never mind the fourth wall, they’re a real part of any play. No passive spectators here. As the actors at the Talking Theatre afterwards said, the audience and actors at the Globe are ‘all in it together’.

Another thing I always enjoy at this theatre is the jig at the end of the play. They kept that here in Blue Stockings, despite the play being a more naturalistic piece than is usually seen at the Globe – and it worked beautifully.

Choreographed to reflect the themes of the piece – with the women sometimes taking the traditionally ‘male’ roles in the dance, and the choreography getting progressively more modern – the jig provided a strangely cathartic end to the play. It certainly left the audience on more of a high note than the script would otherwise have allowed. It felt as if we were celebrating the women and acknowledging how far we have come.

And I do think sometimes we forget how recent this all is. As someone who has been to university myself, and who never questioned my right to learn or to graduate, I was shocked that women were not given the right to graduate from Cambridge until 1948.

1948!

I still feel a bit sick at the thought of the way these women were treated. And yet, in some pockets of our society, similar attitudes prevail. I’ve never understood why women aren’t allowed to be bishops, for example. And judging by some of the abuse levelled at women online, there are quite a few people whose views haven’t changed much from the views of their counterparts in 1896, when Blue Stockings is set.

So it’s not even over. There are still battles to fight and votes to win; there are still attitudes to change – of both men and women. And that’s just in the UK – the education of girls and women is still a contentious subject in many countries around the world. Thinking back to Persepolis, I can see some remarkable parallels with Blue Stockings.

Someone suggested (and I’m not sure who it was) that Blue Stockings would make a great Call The Midwife–style television series.

I think that’d be brilliant. After Jessica Hynes’ not-as-good-as-I-wanted-it-to-be suffragettes comedy recently, maybe pioneering turn-of-the-century women need redeeming on TV. And maybe we need reminding of what they battled against and how they set us on the path we are walking today.


It wouldn’t be as good as a Globe production of course (there’d be no jig for a start), but I could definitely see Blue Stockings working on TV...