This was
something of an enlightening read for me – for two main reasons. I’ve never
read a graphic novel before. And I know next to nothing about the culture and
history of Iran.
So Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi was
educational on both counts.
First off,
let’s deal with the graphic novel thing. Being a literature sort of person, I’d
probably been guilty of an unconscious snootiness regarding graphic novels.
Having read comic books as a kid (mainly Asterix and Tintin – sometimes in the
original French as my dad thought this would help us learn the language!), I
associated the form with light-hearted fiction for children.
Nothing
wrong with light-hearted fiction for children – I read quite a lot of children’s
books – but I think I may have been a bit suspicious of the comic-style form
being used for adults. I certainly didn’t approach Persepolis expecting to be challenged by it intellectually.
But I was
challenged by it. Not in terms of the words or syntax used, but by the ideas
expressed and the themes explored. This is not a light-hearted ‘comic’. It
graphically depicts violence, murder and suicide. The characters swear. They
talk about sex, politics, religion. And through the words and pictures that
Marjane Satrapi uses to tell her story, we are guided through a turbulent time
in Iran’s history.
Persepolis is autobiographical, and through seeing how
our main character’s life changes, we are given a glimpse into the political
and religious upheavals in Iran in the late 20th century. It’s
pretty hard going sometimes. Some moments are powerfully moving and some are
ideologically challenging.
I know very
little about Iran’s history, and of its culture I only really know what I see
on the TV news or what I’ve read about in books like Reading Lolita in Tehran. Most of what I know is about the oppression
of women. And while this is undeniably a big deal in Persepolis, it’s made clear that it’s all part of a larger
tapestry.
So this
book opened a window. I learnt something about the revolution and the unrest
that came before and after it. I couldn’t help reflecting on the situation in
Egypt at the moment as I read it. I also learnt a bit about Iran’s war with
Iraq (I was just about being born when this was actually happening), and it
made me wonder about all the subsequent conflicts in and around the area.
What struck
me most was how complicated it all is. The drawings in this book may all be in
black and white, but the narrative itself doesn’t fall into black and white
morality. I think I’ve come away from reading Persepolis feeling even more confused about Iran as a country. But
then, perhaps that’s what happens when you have a little more knowledge. It’s
easier to be certain when you’re ignorant.
So there
are books that come and go and don’t leave much impression, and there are books
that leave you thinking. I know that next time Iran is mentioned on the news I’ll
be thinking about this book. And I know that next time someone recommends a
graphic novel to me, I won’t be so slow to read it. Persepolis has left me just that little bit more knowledgeable, and
just that little bit more open-minded.
Always good
things for a book to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment